Home Blog Page 69

Admirers remember Roe vs. Wade lawyer Sarah Weddington as ‘a Texas giant’

Admirers remember Roe vs. Wade lawyer Sarah Weddington as ‘a Texas giant’

Hundreds of mourners took to social media on Sunday to remember the life of Sarah Weddington, a key figure and pioneer in women’s abortion rights, who died in her sleep in Austin on Sunday. She was 76 years old.

“Sarah Weddington was a great Texan who changed the course of our nation’s history,” Dallas Representative Colin Allred said in a prepared statement. “Our generation of Texans has a responsibility to continue its efforts to protect the right to choose, and I will always work in Congress to do so.”

Weddington was 26 when she first argued the landmark abortion case Roe v. Wade in the Supreme Court.

Abortion became legal in the United States when the court made its 7-2 decision on January 22, 1973, making Weddington a hero to some and a villain to others.

“Sarah Weddington was a giant in Texas,” Texas Representative John Bosey III said in a tweet. “From the prosecution of Roe v. Wade, to serving in the Texas House, to supporting countless women in politics, she has left a legacy of struggle for progress almost unparalleled.”

Susan Hayes, an intern and former student at Weddington, said on Twitter that Weddington inspired her to be a lawyer and that they often talked about politics and service.

“Public schools don’t teach kids what they don’t have or don’t have except for the work of people like Sarah,” Hayes said. “Her lessons opened my eyes to how weak my freedom and independence as a human being is.”

In a tweet, Hayes said Weddington worked on Roe v. Wade because law firms were reluctant to hire women in the 1970s.

Hayes said this meant that Weddington had “a lot of time for good problems,” including running for office and becoming the first woman from Travis County elected to the Texas legislature.

Michelle Deitch, a faculty member at the University of Texas at Austin School of Law and Public Policy, said she met Weddington when she first moved to Austin. Deitch said Weddington was warm and welcoming and gave great guidance.

“We’ve lost a real soul and a good soul,” Deitch said.

US Representative Lloyd Doggett described Weddington as a friend, and praised her for her work in support of women’s reproductive freedom, but also acknowledged her work as a legislator, presidential advisor, educator and public speaker.

“Her passion for reproductive freedom was matched by her compassion for our neighbours. She shows the tremendous impact a woman of one determination can have,” Doggett said in a tweet. “With Sarah gone, it is more important than ever to ensure that basic constitutional freedom does not go away. for which I have received recognition from our highest court.”

A state representative, Celia Israel, said Weddington was her professor at Austin University, and that Weddington held her to “high standards.”

Weddington’s death comes at a time when reproductive rights are still hotly debated. The Supreme Court is currently reviewing a case related to Mississippi’s ban on abortion after 15 weeks of pregnancy, considered the biggest challenge in years to Roe’s decision.

“With reproductive health care under attack here in Texas and across the country, we must follow Sarah’s lead and fight for what’s right with the courage of our convictions,” Texas Governor candidate Beto O’Rourke said in a written statement.

Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas also praised Weddington’s work, with spokeswoman Sarah Waite saying she “grown up at a time when women faced restrictions and roadblocks in nearly every aspect of their lives. As a young Texas attorney, she stood fearlessly before the US Supreme Court.” To make a historic decision on abortion rights that changed the course of history and opened doors for the generations that followed.”

Bill and Melinda Gates are officially divorced

Bill and Melinda Gates are officially divorced

Bill and Melinda French Gates

Chris Ratcliffe | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Microsoft founders Bill Gates and Melinda French Gates divorced after 27 years of marriage. Monday’s filing in Washington’s King County Superior Court made the move official, three months after the couple announced their plan to separate.

Bill Gates and Melinda French Gates were among the most prominent couples in global show business, having worked together at one point. They traveled together and participated in joint media interviews. The New York Times reported in May that Melinda French Gates was uneasy about her husband’s relationship with billionaire investor Jeffrey Epstein, and after the media published details of the bond between the two men, she hired lawyers for the divorce.

Monday’s file says neither spouse has asked for a name change, but it doesn’t give insight into all that will be changed. A dismissal contract has not been submitted to the court.

While the two agreed to continue working together on charitable work, it is likely that the collaboration will also end with the marriage. Last month, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, where the two serve as chair and trustees, said Melinda French Gates would resign if either of them concluded after two years they could not work together.

Bill Gates started Microsoft with Paul Allen in 1975 and Gates served as CEO, and Melinda French Gates worked at Microsoft from 1987 to 1996. The two met in 1987, married in 1994, and launched their company in 2000.

In 2019, Microsoft received a report that Bill Gates attempted to start an intimate relationship with an employee in 2000, and a board committee conducted an investigation with the help of a law firm, a Microsoft spokesperson told CNBC earlier. Gates left Microsoft’s board of directors in early 2020, but a spokesman for Bill Gates told the New York Times that his decision to step down had nothing to do with the case.

Today Bill Gates is the fourth richest person in the world, with a fortune of $152 billion, according to Bloomberg. Since the Gates said they would go their separate ways, filings show that Bill Gates holding company Cascade Investment transferred shares of AutoNation and Deere to Melinda French Gates.

Melinda French Gates has recently been active in philanthropy related to gender equality, along with Mackenzie Scott, the ex-wife of Amazon founder Jeff Bezos.

He watches: Gates Foundation outlines contingency plans after divorce


Bitcoin Proponent Senator Cynthia Lummis To Introduce Comprehensive Crypto Bill In 2022

Bitcoin Proponent Senator Cynthia Lummis To Introduce Comprehensive Crypto Bill In 2022

According to a Bloomberg report, Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC) holder and US Senator Cynthia Loomis plans to file a blanket crypto bill in 2022.

If passed and signed into law by Congress, the legislation would create a new regulatory body, overseen by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), to oversee and manage the cryptocurrency market, although no proposed name for the organization has been given.

The report also notes that the bill would regulate stablecoins, establish crypto tax laws, and create consumer protections for crypto investors.

The legislation would be one of the first steps by Congress in setting rules for cryptocurrency. The bill would face a political snag in the relatively divided US Senate over digital asset regulation.

Lummis is a staunch supporter of cryptocurrency and records show that she bought $50,001 to $100,000 worth of BTC in August.

She is also a member of the Senate Banking Committee, which oversees banking and currencies, and has questioned crypto-industry experts about digital assets.

Earlier this month, fellow Republicans urged lawmakers to block Jay Powell’s re-nomination as Federal Reserve Chairman over his crypto policies.

Related link: Is DeFi dangerous? Elizabeth Warren thinks so

Sarah Weddington, attorney who won Roe v Wade abortion case, dies aged 76 | Roe v Wade

Sarah Weddington, the attorney who pleaded and won the Roe v. Wade Supreme Court case that established the right to abortion in the United States, has died at the age of 76.

Susan Hayes, the Democratic nominee for the Texas Agriculture Commissioner, announce The news was posted on Twitter on Sunday and confirmed by the Dallas Morning News.

“Sarah Weddington passed away this morning after a series of health problems,” Hayes wrote. “With Linda Covey, she filed the first case of her legal career, Roe v Wade, a recent law school graduate. She was my professor…the best writing teacher I had, and a great teacher.

At the age of twenty-seven, I argued with Ro [the supreme court] (A fact that has always made me feel like an underachiever.) Ironically, she worked on the case because law firms were not hiring women in the early 1970s, leaving her with plenty of time to face good problems.”

The court ruled in Roe v. Wade in 1973. Nearly 50 years later, the right she established is under threat by a Supreme Court filled with hard-line conservatives, thanks in part to Texas law that greatly restricts access and offers incentives to report women to the authorities.

In 2017, speaking to the Guardian, Weddington predicted such a turn of events. “if [Neil] Gorsuch’s candidacy approved, would abortion be illegal the next day? No, one new judge wouldn’t necessarily make much difference. But maybe two or three.”

After directing Gorsuch to court—and filling the vacant seat by Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell when Barack Obama was president—Donald Trump installed Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Connie Barrett. Barrett replaced the late Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the women’s rights champion.

Sarah Weddington
Sarah Weddington stands with a signed copy of the decision in Roe v. Wade before the US Supreme Court in 2005. Photo: Karen Blair/AFP/Getty

Weddington found her way to Roe v Wade shortly after graduating from University of Texas Law School. Represented by Weddington and Covey, Norma McCorvey became the plaintiff known as “Jane Roe” in Roe v. Wade. McCorvey became an evangelical Christian and opposed abortion. She passed away in 2017.

In her interview with The Guardian, Weddington discussed discussing the case in federal court. “I was very nervous,” she said. “It was like going down a street without lights. But there was no other way to go and I had no preconceived notions that I was not going to win.”

She won, but the case persisted.

“Henry Wade, the attorney general, inadvertently helped us,” she said. “I don’t care what any court says; I will continue to prosecute doctors who perform abortions,” he told a news conference. “There was a procedural rule that said if local elected officials continued to sue after a federal court declared the law unconstitutional, there would be the right to Appeal to the Supreme Court.”

“It was impossible to read the judges’ faces,” Weddington said in court in Washington. “The lawyer on the other side started saying something inappropriate about discussing a case against a beautiful woman. He thought the judges would be sneered. But their faces didn’t change a bit.”

“I had to argue it twice in the Supreme Court: in 1971 and again in 1972. On January 22, 1973 I was in the Texas legislature when the phone rang. She was a reporter from the New York Times.” Does Miss Weddington have Today’s comment about Roe vs. Wade?” My assistant was asked. “Why?” She said, “Is it her?”

“It was a very exciting start. Then we got a telegram from the Supreme Court that I won 7-2 and they were airmailing a copy of the ruling. For now, of course, you just have to go online.

“I was ecstatic, and more than 44 years later we’re still talking about it.”

Weddington later revealed that she had the abortion herself, in 1967. “Just before the anesthesia happened, I thought, ‘I wish no one knew about this,'” she said. “For many years, that was exactly how I felt. Now there is a huge push to encourage Women tell their stories so people realize it’s nothing to be ashamed of. One in five women will have a miscarriage.”

Weddington predicted: “Whatever I do in my life, the headline in my obituary will always be ‘Death of Roe v. Wade’s Counsel.'”

In fact I have achieved so much more, like Hayes Hinge In her tweets on Sunday. “Those career doors that shut in her led her to run for office, being elected as the first woman from Travis County in [Texas legislature] in 1972 (with four other women elected to the House of Representatives: Kay Bailey, Chris Miller, Betty Andugar, and Sinfonia Thompson).

She was the General Counsel of the US Department of Agriculture under [Jimmy] Carter and enjoyed her mission in the capital. Federal judicial nominations for Texas were run by her as a high-ranking Texan in the administration.

Weddington when she was a special assistant to President Jimmy Carter. Photo: Bettmann / Bettmann Archive

“A lawyer from Dallas she knew sought for a seat. I interviewed him while he was in UT law. He asked her, “What are we going to tell our wives if we hire you?” She told him he wasted their and hers and walked out of the interview. He didn’t get eliminated.

“Ever the proper preacher’s daughter, she never told me who the lawyer was. People don’t know that about Sarah. She was Like A suitable Methodist minister’s daughter. One of the few people I couldn’t curse in front of.”

Hayes also paid tribute to Weddington’s memory as a teacher and member of the “Great Austin Matriarchal Order” which also included former Texas Governor Anne Richards and columnist Molly Ivins.

In an interview with The Guardian, Weddington indicated that she was at peace with her recollection of Roe v. Wade. “I think most women of my generation can remember our feelings about the fight,” she said. “It’s like acne. You may not feel exactly the same, but you remember it.”

Sarah Weddington, Lawyer Who Argued Roe V. Wade, Dies at 76 | Texas News

By Jackie Bleiberg, The Associated Press

DALLAS (AFP) – Sarah Weddington, a 26-year-old Texas attorney who successfully argued the landmark abortion rights case Roe v. Wade in the US Supreme Court, died Sunday. She was 76 years old.

Susan Hayes, a student and former Weddington classmate, said she died in her sleep early Sunday morning at her home in Austin. Hayes told the Associated Press that Weddington had been in poor health for some time and it was not immediately clear what caused her death.

The daughter of a minister was raised in the West Texas town of Abilene, Weddington attended the University of Texas Law School. Two years after her graduation, she and former classmate, Linda Coffey, filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of a pregnant woman defying a state law that largely bans abortions.

The case of “Jane Roe,” whose real name is Norma McCorvey, was brought against Dallas County District Attorney Henry Wade, and eventually went to the Supreme Court.

political cartoons

Weddington pleaded the case to the Supreme Court twice, in December 1971 and again in October 1972, leading the following year to a 7-2 ruling that legalized abortion nationwide.

Weddington’s death comes as the Supreme Court is hearing a case related to Mississippi’s ban on abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy, widely seen as the biggest challenge in years to Roe’s decision.

While this case was before the court, Weddington also ran to represent Austin in the Texas House of Representatives. She was elected in 1972 and served three terms as a state legislator, before becoming general counsel for the U.S. Department of Agriculture and later serving as an advisor on women’s issues to President Jimmy Carter.

Weddington later wrote a book on Roe v. Wade, and gave lectures and taught courses at The University of Texas at Austin and Texas Women’s University on leadership, law, and gender discrimination. She remained active in the political and legal worlds until her later years, attending the 2019 signing ceremony of a New York state law intended to protect abortion rights in the event that Roe v. Wade was overturned.

Copyright 2021 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


Photos of aftermath of massacre in Myanmar fuel outrage

Photos of aftermath of massacre in Myanmar fuel outrage

BANGKOK – Images of the aftermath of a Christmas Eve massacre in eastern Myanmar that left more than 30 people, including women and children, dead and their cars burned, have spread on social media, sparking outrage against the military. He took power in February.

Pictures showed the charred bodies of more than 30 people in three burnt-out cars, reportedly shot by government forces as they fled the fighting. Accounts cannot be verified independently.

Save the Children International said two of its staff were missing in the massacre, which has fueled anger against the army, which took power after toppling Aung San Suu Kyi’s elected government. Save the Children said it would suspend its operations in the area.

The US Embassy in Myanmar said on Sunday that it was appalled by the “barbaric attack in Kayah State that killed at least 35 civilians, including women and children”.

“We will continue to press for accountability for the perpetrators of the ongoing campaign of violence against the people of Burma,” she said in a statement.

One of the villagers, who said he went to the scene, told the Associated Press that the victims fled fighting between armed resistance groups and the Myanmar army near Koy Ngan village, next to Mu Su, on Friday. He said that they were killed after the forces arrested them while they were on their way to the refugee camps in the western part of the town.

Save the Children said two of its staff who were traveling home for holidays after conducting humanitarian response work in a nearby community were “trapped in the incident and are still missing”.

“We have confirmation that their private car was attacked and burned,” the group added in a statement. The military reportedly forced people to leave their cars, arrested some, and killed others, burning their bodies.

The government has not commented on the allegations, but a report in the state-run Myanma Allen daily on Saturday said fighting near Mu Su erupted on Friday when members of the ethnic guerrilla forces, known as the Karenni National Progressive Party, and the army’s oldest opponents began Driving “suspicious” cars and attacking security forces after they refused to stop.

The newspaper’s report stated that among them were new members who were on their way to attend exercises to fight the army, and that the seven cars they were traveling in were destroyed in a fire. No further details were given about the killings.

The witness told the AP that the remains were cremated beyond recognition, and children’s and women’s clothing along with medical supplies and food were found.

“The bodies were tied with ropes before being cremated,” said the witness, who spoke on condition of anonymity out of fear for his safety.

He did not see the moment they were killed, but said he believed some of them were Mo Su villagers who were reportedly arrested by troops on Friday. He denied that the detainees were members of organized local militias.

Myanmar independent media reported on Friday that the military had arrested 10 villagers from Mo Su, including children. The media said that four members of the local paramilitary Border Guard forces who went to negotiate for their release were reportedly tied up and shot in the head by the military.

The witness said villagers and anti-government militias left the bodies behind as military forces arrived near Mu Su while preparing the bodies for cremation.

“It is a heinous crime and the worst incident during Christmas. We strongly condemn that massacre as a crime against humanity,” said Panyar Khun Aung, director of the Karenni Human Rights Group.

Earlier this month, government forces were also accused of arresting, tying up and slaughtering villagers, some of whom they believed were children. Opposition leader Dr. Sasa, who used only one name, said civilians were burned alive.

A video clip following the Dec. 7 attack – apparently in response to an attack on a military convoy – showed the charred bodies of 11 people lying in a circle amid what appeared to be the remains of a hut.

Fighting resumed over the weekend on the border with Thailand, with thousands of people fleeing to seek shelter. The Myanmar army has launched heavy artillery and air strikes on Lai Kai Kau, a small town held by ethnic Karen fighters in neighboring Kayin State, since Friday, local officials said.

The governor of Thailand’s Tak Province, Somchai Charoenkitroungrug, told reporters that about 4,700 evacuees from Myanmar were in three shelters across the border. Gunfire and explosions were heard across the river separating the two countries.

He ordered five border regions to prepare supplies and secure places to receive more refugees from Myanmar.

The military action in Myanmar prompted several Western governments including the United States to issue a joint statement condemning the “gross human rights violations committed by the military regime across the country”.

“We call on the regime to immediately cease its indiscriminate attacks in Karen State and throughout the country, and to ensure the safety of all civilians in line with international law,” the joint statement read.


Exchange: New Legal Profession Starting in Arizona | Arizona News

By Kira Haas, Arizona Capitol Times

Phoenix (AP) — Ten non-lawyer paralegals will soon begin work in Arizona, providing legal services in limited practice areas previously limited to licensed attorneys.

The creation of this new level of legal service providers is an attempt to narrow the ‘justice gap’. That’s the difference between the civil legal needs of low-income people and the resources available to meet them, according to the Foundation for Legal Services, the nation’s largest funder of that assistance.

Research on unmet civil legal needs indicates that about 80% of these needs do not reach a court. At the same time, legal aid organizations are able to satisfy less than half of those who seek legal aid,” according to a 2019 report from the Arizona Supreme Court Task Force on Legal Services Delivery.

One of the task force’s recommendations was to establish the paraprofessional legal program. Utah and Washington have launched similar programs. The Arizona Capitol Times reported that states including California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, New York and Oregon are exploring the possibility.

political cartoons

The Arizona Supreme Court’s Board of Non-Legal Legal Providers licensed these top ten paralegals in late November. They will soon be associate members of the Arizona Bar, after which they can begin to provide these limited services without the oversight of an attorney. Limited practice areas include family law, limited civil jurisdiction, limited jurisdiction, and criminal and administrative law. Before applying for a license, individuals must pass a basic exam and an exam for their specific field of practice.

Paralegals will cover a middle ground, performing legal work that may not be cost-effective for a lawyer, but may also be too complex for an individual to tackle on their own. Amber Labadie said she can work with a typical family law client who doesn’t have complicated financial issues but still needs help with something like a divorce or custody matter.

“A lot of times[clients]are quoted $5,000, $10,000,” she said. “Because I’m not a lawyer, I can do this at a lower cost.”

So far, 21 people have passed the two tests required to apply for a license.

With a 40-year legal career, a newly licensed Labadie, like the others in this first group, qualifies as a legal paralegal because of her legal experience, along with passing required exams. To qualify, applicants had to have spent seven of the past ten years working as a paralegal. Labadie said she was excited that there was now a step between a paralegal and an attorney, similar to what a nurse practitioner means to a doctor.

“I saw it as an opportunity to go further because I couldn’t as a paralegal – it was as far as I could go,” Labadie said.

New paralegals are required to follow the State Supreme Court’s Code of Professional Conduct. They must complete continuing education and can face investigation and disciplinary penalties for violations of the rules as other members of the bar.

While the first group has qualified through experience, colleges and universities are also adapting and/or building programs for students to qualify through education or a combination of education and experience, said Susan Porter, director of Arizona Supreme Court Legal Services Programs.

“I think the interest is greater than the numbers will show yet, given that there are still educational programs in development,” Porter said.

Labadie has worked at Lewis Labadie, a small law firm with offices in Tempe and Maricopa, since 2016. Her daughter Brittany Labadie is the managing partner of the firm. Amber Labadie said the company is starting to move away from family law, but with its new license, it wants to bring back some of that in an affordable way.

“Customers with millions of dollars are going to go to hire a great lawyer — they’re not going to hire a lawyer,” Labadie said. “It’s the hard-working middle class people who need the legal advice or legal assistance that LP should be able to provide.”

Family law is the area in greatest need, according to a 2019 report from the state Supreme Court’s task force.

The report found that hiring a lawyer is often prohibitively expensive, leading some to either represent themselves or simply not address the legal issue. Task force members stated that explaining how to navigate the courts is not enough.

Copyright 2021 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


Significant changes in Income Tax Law in the year 2021

Income Tax - Significant Changes - Income Tax Law 2021 - Taxscan

Income Tax - Important Changes - Income Tax Law 2021 - Tax Survey
  1. Mandatory link between PAN and Aadhaar

Notify CBDT of the deadline to associate your permanent account number with your Aadhaar number. The deadline for associating a PAN with Aadhaar has been extended to June 30, 2021. According to reports, the government may take a tough stance against taxpayers who did not like their PAN with Aadhaar. Moreover, the report also says that if the employee fails to link the PAN to the Aadhaar card by June 30, the company will not calculate his salary from next month.

The administration has made the ITR filing process easier for taxpayers by making pre-filled income tax return available for some categories. An option for pre-filled ITR forms is available on the new website. Taxpayers will be able to proactively update their profile to provide certain income details including salary, home holdings, work or occupation that will be used to pre-populate their IIR.

Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) Pramod Chandra Modi said the budget provision making interest on employee contributions in excess of Rs 2.5 k per annum to taxable Employees Provident Fund (EPF) will also apply to all government employees covered by the General Provident Fund (GPF) .

The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has issued a circular regarding the use of the job under Section 206AB and 206CCA of the Income Tax Act 1961. The Finance Act, 2021 incorporated two new Sections 206AB and 206CCA into the Income Tax Act 1961 which takes effect on July 1, 2021 These sections impose a tax deduction (section 206AB) or tax collection (section 206CCA) at a higher rate in the case of certain non-filing persons (specified persons) in connection with tax deductions (other than sections 192, 192A, 194 B, 194 BB, and 194 LBC). and 194N) and tax collection. The higher rate is twice the specified rate or 5%, whichever is higher. The specified person means the person who fulfills both conditions.

Section 139 of the Income Tax Law governs the filing of income tax returns by every individual whose income exceeds the basic exemption limit. However, the 2021 Union Budget in order to provide relief in terms of the compliance burden to file returns, exempted seniors over the age of 75 from filing an income tax return, according to various conditions.

The government has introduced the LTC/LTA cash voucher system to allow eligible LTC/LTA employees to claim tax credit reimbursement for similar amounts subject to certain spending limits and conditions. This was done because employees are unable to travel due to the coronavirus pandemic.

The interest on the employee’s share of the contribution to the Employees Provident Fund (EPF) on or after 1st April 2021, will be taxable at the withdrawal stage if it exceeds ₹ 2.5 lakh in any year. This will lead to additional tax obligations, especially for high net worth individuals (HNIs) who make higher contributions, and will also discourage Voluntary Provident Fund (VPF) contributions. This combined with the taxation of total employer contributions greater than EGP 7.5 to EPF, NPS, Pension Fund and interest made in the past year, may make an EPF a less attractive retirement plan.

The government has extended the additional tax deduction of Rs 1.5 lakh on interest paid on housing loans for the purchase of affordable homes for another year until March 31, 2022. The additional deduction of Rs 1.5 lakh and above has been introduced. In the 2019 budget, this is allowed for those who buy homes for the first time at a cost of up to INR 45,000.

Effective April 1, 2021, the Finance Bill, 2021 has incorporated the new chapter which is the Dispute Resolution Commission. The central government has consciously adopted a policy of making operations under law, which requires communication with taxpayers, completely anonymous. Against this background, new schemes for anonymous assessment, anonymous appeal at the commissioner level (appeal), and faceless sanctioning have already been implemented. Furthermore, the Tax and Other Laws (Commutation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act 2020 has given the central government the authority to introduce similar schemes for other functions performed by income tax authorities.

  1. Submission of Form 10-IE to choose a new tax regime

To select a new tax regime for individuals and HUFs pursuant to Section 115BAC of the Income Tax Act, the taxpayer will be required to file Form 10-IE on or before the due date for filing ITR u/s 139(1) of the Income Tax Act.

Support our press by subscribing to Taxscan AdFree. Follow us cable For quick updates.

Richmond Homicide Total Edges Toward Total Reached in 2004 | Virginia News

RICHMOND, Virginia (Associated Press) – The city of Richmond is nearing the most police killings since 2004, a total marked by the fact that victims and suspects are getting younger and younger, authorities said.

The Richmond Times-Dispatch reports that the Richmond Commonwealth Attorney’s Office said there were 90 murders in 2021, the most in any year since 95 murders occurred in 2004. On the other hand, 13 people were killed in Richmond so far in December Among them, eight were killed in eight days.

Commonwealth Deputy Attorney Laird Barry noted that the city saw 24 more murders this year compared to 2020, and compared it to a 10-year period in the 1980s and 1990s when Richmond committed 100 or more murders each year.

“We have a problem again,” said Barry, a veteran homicide attorney general. “This is the city’s #1 problem.”

In the past three years, at least 98 children under 18 have been infected in the city. Of those, 14 have died. At least nine people under the age of 18 have been charged with murders this year, compared to just five for 2019 and 2020, according to police statistics.

political cartoons

“We have to stop this because our children are dying,” said Tracy Scott, one of several community advocates who spoke during a recent meeting aimed at stopping gun violence in the city.

Richmond Police Chief Gerald Smith and other city officials, along with local community advocates, believe mentoring young people is a key part of the crime prevention puzzle. Grassroots groups that perform these services hope to get some of the $1.5 million in federal funding the city has allocated to prevent violence. A steering committee is formed to decide how the funds will be distributed.

We need everyone to unite. Our youth are the ones who commit the majority of murders and shootings. Our youth are the victims of this gun violence. We must speak to our youth,” said Smith, who became the city’s police chief in July 2020.

Law enforcement and community leaders all agree that much of the violence stems from controversies on social media, and Smith believes that the pandemic’s isolation has only increased people’s reliance on those platforms, both in Richmond and nationwide.

“A lot of these struggles are driven by social media,” Smith said. “It’s not gasoline on fire. It’s like dynamite on fire. We can trace the roots of some of these killings even then.”

Besides the ages of those involved in the murders, other trends show more shootings from a speeding car by groups of young people, increased use of assault rifles, and more cases of gunmen shooting indiscriminately into crowds.

For example, city prosecutors have 13 defendants facing trial representing three cars packed with suspects who carried out three murders, Barry said.

“We’re seeing an increase in the number of juvenile and teenage offenders,” Richmond District Attorney Brooke Pettit said. “The number is definitely higher than these incidents where we have many criminals riding in a car somewhere together to commit a crime. Instead of having one trial for every murder, we have three or four trials because they work in groups.”

The total number of murders this year in Richmond was 99, but this includes cases that authorities do not consider homicides, such as murders in self-defense and accidental shootings.

Copyright 2021 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


Trump sues New York attorney general

Trump sues New York attorney general

Written by Steve Pettenbender

Center Square Contributor

(The Center Square) — Former President Trump and the Trump Organization filed a lawsuit in federal court last week to stop investigations by New York Attorney General Letitia James into both.

In a 30-page complaint, Mr. Trump and the company claimed that their First, Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights had been infringed. The lawsuit seeks injunctions against Mrs. James “to cease immediately or, at the very least, to appropriately limit all ongoing investigations” for the duration of the lawsuit. The plaintiffs are also seeking a ruling that James’ actions constituted “unauthorized conduct by the state and abuse of process” for political gain.

“She has been entrusted with so much power that she must use it in a firm and unbiased manner,” the suit says. “Rather than shoulder this responsibility, James instead chose to exploit it. For years, she has grossly abused her investigative powers to target her political opponents and advance her career. Her relentless attacks on Donald J. Trump are a role model.”

The lawsuit lists Ms James as an “outspoken political activist” and cited that four years ago, she made the then-president’s tenure a cornerstone of her campaign for attorney general.

Ms James launched an investigation in 2019 into both Trump and the development company he founded. That investigation began after Michael Cohen, Trump’s former lawyer, told a congressional committee that the company’s annual financial reports would inflate the values ​​of some properties in order to get better rates for loans and insurance plans while simultaneously downgrading other properties for tax purposes.

In May, it was reported that the Attorney General’s investigation became a criminal case.

In a statement, Ms. James said Mr. Trump and his company had made clear where the investigation was left off. She called the lawsuit filed in US District Court in Albany an “attempted side-attack” on her office’s efforts.

“To be clear, neither Mr. Trump nor the Trump Organization has the right to dictate whether and where he will respond to their actions,” Ms James said. “Our investigation will continue unchecked because no one is above the law, not even someone named Trump.”

Mr. Trump is not the only official who has claimed that Ms. James has political motives behind her work.

Former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo also called on Ms James, saying she had sought to profit politically from an independent investigation into allegations of sexual harassment against Mr Cuomo, who resigned in August.

Earlier this year, Mrs. James announced plans to run for next governor-general and challenge incumbent Cathy Hochhol for the Democratic nomination. However, earlier this month, she reversed course and chose instead to run for re-election next year.